h1xfer485
01-29 01:00 PM
Can we pursue to have an amendment like SKIL bill or something in Economy stimulus bill? The amendment can be relevant to economy stimulus since it will give competitive advantage to america thereby stimulating the economy. (Something like AC21 made into law in 2000 to increase american competitiveness to stimulate economy)
Also, this way, there is a chance that legal immigration issues will be discussed separately from illegal immigration issues.
The economy stimulus bill is being currently discussed in House and soon will be in Senate where lot of amendments will be voted on. The bill seems to have bi-partisan support as well. We can hope this will be one more amendment to the bill!
Also, this way, there is a chance that legal immigration issues will be discussed separately from illegal immigration issues.
The economy stimulus bill is being currently discussed in House and soon will be in Senate where lot of amendments will be voted on. The bill seems to have bi-partisan support as well. We can hope this will be one more amendment to the bill!
wallpaper GOLDEN TEMPLE
Sandeep
02-17 02:11 PM
I understand that cross chargeability becomes valid at the time of allocation of the visa number. So what do you mean by "in advance"?
bommanavasu
07-25 05:58 PM
Hi
I have moved recently to San Jose. Can anyone help me where to find doctor for my medical check up for my GC.
I have moved recently to San Jose. Can anyone help me where to find doctor for my medical check up for my GC.
2011 golden temple amritsar at
smartin
04-30 06:02 PM
Hi all,
I had my h1 issued in nov '09 and was laid off from the company in march '10. However, I was able to secure other position in the same company a month later. But now the company wants me to exit/re-enter the country (and get my visa stamped) before starting the new position.
Since I was technically out of status for the month of April (and don't have any paystubs for the same), will it be difficult to get my h1 visa stamped? Also, can I get my stamping done in Canada, or will I have to my home country?
Thanks in advance..
S. M
I had my h1 issued in nov '09 and was laid off from the company in march '10. However, I was able to secure other position in the same company a month later. But now the company wants me to exit/re-enter the country (and get my visa stamped) before starting the new position.
Since I was technically out of status for the month of April (and don't have any paystubs for the same), will it be difficult to get my h1 visa stamped? Also, can I get my stamping done in Canada, or will I have to my home country?
Thanks in advance..
S. M
more...
ItIsNotFunny
03-22 10:41 AM
What help do you need? To complain about this company to USCIS or to buy this company? :)
Let us not make these forums a place to discuss companies and job prospects.
In better words, let us keep IV limited to retrogression and immigration related issues only. There are other portals available where you can discuss all this.
Let us not make these forums a place to discuss companies and job prospects.
In better words, let us keep IV limited to retrogression and immigration related issues only. There are other portals available where you can discuss all this.
InTheMoment
05-14 04:21 PM
Doesn't matter if you only live in AZ or not! If you live in the Border Areas (North and South), or are traveling in those areas, it is better you carry it.
I never carry mine and do not intend to unless fit I the above case. I have memorized my A# and that of my spouse and am willing to go thro' to whatever rare hassle that I may face than losing my wallet and having to replace my GC for $370! Futher I do not want identity thieves getting another piece of info about me.
I never carry mine and do not intend to unless fit I the above case. I have memorized my A# and that of my spouse and am willing to go thro' to whatever rare hassle that I may face than losing my wallet and having to replace my GC for $370! Futher I do not want identity thieves getting another piece of info about me.
more...
snhn
04-24 04:46 PM
Hello all
I have a question. My wife called TSC today, and she talked to one of the most rudest person in the world. unfortunatelly she forgot to write his information down.
Baiscally, while she was talking my son was bothering her and cryin in a low pitch. The bastard TSC agen had the odesity to tell my wife to take the kid away, and htat is he dying.. you should got help him. Obviouslly he was not saying that because he was nice. He started to laguh. I am so furious right now.
So my question is can we find out who this agent was by callin INS and asking them who opened her file last. I sure would love to have few minutes with him one on one. Show him what we do to peace of crap like him if we was back home.
Anyhows, appreciate your answers.
I have a question. My wife called TSC today, and she talked to one of the most rudest person in the world. unfortunatelly she forgot to write his information down.
Baiscally, while she was talking my son was bothering her and cryin in a low pitch. The bastard TSC agen had the odesity to tell my wife to take the kid away, and htat is he dying.. you should got help him. Obviouslly he was not saying that because he was nice. He started to laguh. I am so furious right now.
So my question is can we find out who this agent was by callin INS and asking them who opened her file last. I sure would love to have few minutes with him one on one. Show him what we do to peace of crap like him if we was back home.
Anyhows, appreciate your answers.
2010 Golden Temple Wallpaper.
PIXELTRON
03-27 01:58 PM
I am going to try posting a large size image with a link later. Hand drawing with colors included in Fireworks. I am the guy following Kirupa's bills.
more...
lokeymd
04-01 07:37 AM
I had already gotten my USDOS approval and my USCIS approval for my J waiver. The whole process took less than a month which surprised us! But it was stated on the I-797 that I should start working for my employer within 90days from March 19, which will be June 19. The problem is my training program does not end until June 30. Even if I wait until June 19 to file for my H1B, and if I don't go for premium processing, once they approve it and retro-date it, there will be an overlap from June 19-30. Can I apply for the H1 on June 30 instead (when my J expires) but that will be more than 90 days from March 19? I will appreciate any suggestions. Thanks!
hair 2010 pictures golden temple
ChiefBill
March 23rd, 2010, 02:48 PM
Got another question for Nikon people - a friend sent his D300s in for repair. Nikon upgraded the firmware, and now he can't open the RAW (NEF) files in CS3. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Bill
Thanks,
Bill
more...
gc4vk
07-09 01:35 PM
Hello ALL,
My spouse and myself are called for 485 initial interview, .
1) Do my spouse need to take Affidavit of Support docs(form I 864), my 485 is employment based and not family based(I am the primary applicant).
EB3-IN,
PD : June-1-06, NSC
I140 approved - Jan, 2007.
485 Filed -- Aug 2007
My spouse and myself are called for 485 initial interview, .
1) Do my spouse need to take Affidavit of Support docs(form I 864), my 485 is employment based and not family based(I am the primary applicant).
EB3-IN,
PD : June-1-06, NSC
I140 approved - Jan, 2007.
485 Filed -- Aug 2007
hot The Golden Temple Amritsar
ayyadav
04-29 07:50 PM
Today, I was reviewing my I-485 application form and found that Under Part 3 Processing Information, we have to fill-up Place of last entry in United state (City/State):
I put my name there instead of Chicago/IL by mistake. I got I-485 receipt # and case is pending.
How can I correct this information? Is there any way? Please help me.
I put my name there instead of Chicago/IL by mistake. I got I-485 receipt # and case is pending.
How can I correct this information? Is there any way? Please help me.
more...
house golden temple wallpaper.
Blog Feeds
03-22 12:20 PM
We still don't have the official summary of the Senate comprehensive immigration reform bill, but Senator Charles Schumer, the chair of the Senate Immigration Subcommittee and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) have written a joint op-ed piece that will appear in tomorrow morning's Washington Post that describes the major provisions of the CIR bill they will shortly introduce in the Senate. The bill will look similar to previous bills, but we now learn that it will have some new features. They include the introduction of the controversial new national identification card (a biometric social security card). The legalization program will now...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/schumer-and-graham-introduce-cir-to-the-public.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/schumer-and-graham-introduce-cir-to-the-public.html)
tattoo Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple),
Blog Feeds
01-11 10:50 AM
The New York Times carried on its front page this morning a Nina Bernstein article that will no doubt cause a shake up at Immigration and Customs Enforcement over what can only be described as a major scandal in the way the agency has dealt with sick detainees at the agency's detention facilities around the country. The details described by Bernstein will no doubt enrage you. The obvious monumental effort Ms. Bernstein put in to bringing this story will also likely move her on to the short list for a Pulitzer Prize for this hard-hitting piece of journalism.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/ny-times-officials-hid-truth-of-detainee-deaths.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/ny-times-officials-hid-truth-of-detainee-deaths.html)
more...
pictures Golden Temple, Amritsar
Humhongekamyab
02-26 02:40 PM
My PD for the EB-2 application is December 2005 BUT I filed my 485 in August 2008 so I am wondering if the US CIS will work on my 485 once my PD is current or will they wait for the PD and the 485 filing date to be current?
Thanks!
Thanks!
dresses images Golden Temple in
RNGC
03-07 09:18 AM
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=outsourcing&articleId=9066460&taxonomyId=60&intsrc=kc_feat
Bill Gates to appear before congress on March 12, I know it is not easy to approach him and seek his help for our cause in a short time...but felt throwing this idea is not a bad idea....
Anybody know Mr.Gates ?
Bill Gates to appear before congress on March 12, I know it is not easy to approach him and seek his help for our cause in a short time...but felt throwing this idea is not a bad idea....
Anybody know Mr.Gates ?
more...
makeup Photo: Golden Temple
h1b_forever
03-03 10:47 AM
Thanks Pappu for setting this up.
I am looking for a Job in the Detroit Metro area. I have 14 years of experience as Architect, Project manager on Entrprise level projects working on SOA/WebServices/Java EE/System Engineering
If anybody has leads, please message me
I am looking for a Job in the Detroit Metro area. I have 14 years of experience as Architect, Project manager on Entrprise level projects working on SOA/WebServices/Java EE/System Engineering
If anybody has leads, please message me
girlfriend Golden Temple, Amritsar, India
Blog Feeds
08-03 12:50 PM
The folks at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center have come up with a list of recommendations for legislators as they craft a legalization plan in the upcoming comprehensive immigration reform debate: 1. Date of entry requirement for eligibility: The required date of entry should be as close to the date of introduction of the bills as possible. This will accomplish the goal of legalizing as many otherwise deserving immigrants as possible as well as simplifying the administration of the program by CIS. [Simple and Broad Eligibility Provisions] 2. No �known to the government� requirement: The legalization program should not include...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/ilrc-issues-recommendations-for-a-legalization-program.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/ilrc-issues-recommendations-for-a-legalization-program.html)
hairstyles amritsar golden temple
Macaca
04-27 09:43 AM
Sen. Luddite Strikes Again (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602257.html) -- Once more, a mystery Republican blocks electronic filing for Senate candidates, Friday, April 27, 2007
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
Blog Feeds
04-29 04:00 PM
Some of you may know that I've been a co-author of the annually published LexisNexis' J-1 Visa Guidebook for the last dozen years. J-1 visas are used by a variety of folks including students and researchers training in a lot of fields. For many decades, J-1s from developing countries have been required to comply with a requirement to return to their home countries for two years following their J-1 time in the US. The idea is that the J-1 program is a part of the US foreign aid system and the two year requirement is a way to ensure that...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/04/why-is-state-department-using-immigration-policy-to-provide-foreign-aid-to-china.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/04/why-is-state-department-using-immigration-policy-to-provide-foreign-aid-to-china.html)
ss2005
07-29 10:15 AM
My Wife is on H4/AOS.
Her H4 is going to expire in September and she is planning to travel soon.
She has AP and EAD but never used. I am on H1 and used AC21.
My questions are..
1) Can she go to home country and get her H4 stamped and return on H4?
2) Apply AP and return on AP?
3) Assume...If she returns on AP...and show valid EAD while entering at POE....
But by that time her H4 expires.... In this scenario...do we still need to apply H4 extension after entering US?
4) Who supposed to apply H4? Is it employer or H1 holder can also apply H4?
Thanks for your help
Her H4 is going to expire in September and she is planning to travel soon.
She has AP and EAD but never used. I am on H1 and used AC21.
My questions are..
1) Can she go to home country and get her H4 stamped and return on H4?
2) Apply AP and return on AP?
3) Assume...If she returns on AP...and show valid EAD while entering at POE....
But by that time her H4 expires.... In this scenario...do we still need to apply H4 extension after entering US?
4) Who supposed to apply H4? Is it employer or H1 holder can also apply H4?
Thanks for your help
No comments:
Post a Comment